Cover of: consensus-conflict debate | Thomas J. Bernard Read Online

consensus-conflict debate form and content in social theories by Thomas J. Bernard

  • 307 Want to read
  • ·
  • 48 Currently reading

Published by Columbia University Press in New York .
Written in English


  • Sociology -- Methodology,
  • Consensus (Social sciences),
  • Conflict (Psychology),
  • Social values

Book details:

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references and index.

StatementThomas J. Bernard.
LC ClassificationsHM24 .B414 1983
The Physical Object
Paginationxi, 229 p. ;
Number of Pages229
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL3160323M
ISBN 100231056702, 0231056710
LC Control Number83002032

Download consensus-conflict debate


The consensus-conflict debate by Thomas J. Bernard, , Columbia University Press edition, in English Get this from a library! The Consensus-Conflict Debate. Form and Content in Social Theories. [Thomas J Bernard] -- Addresses the debate of whether society is a smoldering set of tension-filled relations that periodically erupt into conflict or an integrated and coordinated whole typified by consensus on values Book. The Consensus-Conflict Debate. Form and Content in Social Theories Details Author(s): Thomas J. Bernard Edition: Publisher: Columbia University Press ?.   `Useful to those interested in group dynamics, the book discusses topics such as groups′ functions, decision making, group conflict and consensus and the role of values in that process, and communication′ - Choice `A complex and sophisticated argument is  › Books › Health, Fitness & Dieting › Psychology & Counseling.

  The consensus-conflict debate: form and content in social theories, Thomas J. Bernard Instantiates. The consensus-conflict debate: form and content in social theories; Publication. New York, Columbia University Press, ; Bibliography note Includes bibliographical references and index Carrier category volume Carrier MARC source rdacarrier The Consensus vs.. Conflict debate is important in the CSS, policing, courts, and corrections, and the rivalry within social groups and rulers (Peak, , ). The justice system having many conflicts in each system, together makes the overall conflict even larger. Although the ultimate goal, justice, may be the same for the system as a whole   Chapter 9. The Relation Between Consensus and Conflict Theories was published in The Consensus-Conflict Debate. Form and Content in Social Theories on page ?.   On Conflict and Consensus. Conflict is usually viewed as an impediment to reaching agreements and disruptive to peaceful relationships. However, it is the underlying thesis of Formal Consensus that nonviolent conflict is necessary and desirable. It provides the motivations for improvement. The challenge is the creation of an understanding in

book was to raise awareness that the normal state of. around the issues of consensus, conflict, and diversity Although, for example, the paradigm debate :// /_Questioning_Consensus_Cultivating_Conflict. Education plays a significant role in society. Educational institutions take part on society in different aspects; such as on the peoples intellectual development, politics, economics and several other fields. There are several theories that deal with the formulation of the foundation of education in relation to the society. Among of these theories are the conflict and consensus This book presents a bold new theory of the processes of collective decision-making that draws on theoretical influences ranging from group decision theory through to the authors' own social representations theory. Moscovici and Doise offer a novel analysis of group conflict and the construction of consensus to produce a general theory of collective ://?id=BB9I5jDJBTkC. Differences Between Consensus and Conflict Theories Two theories attempt to explain human behavior- conflict and consensus theories. Consensus theory asserts that the social order can be attained through having shared norms, beliefs, and values, whereas conflict theory argues that inequalities produce class conflicts. The world is then perceived through opposing viewpoints which affect how